This chapter provides the results for the research. Because the work was analytically determined by the application of respective exploratory factors, the tests were done and consistently aided by the critically expectations of the effectiveness defined and the relevance of the measurements used. This particularly provides the critical component aiding the final research.
Do you want to write about William Shakespeare, this outstanding person? In case you need some useful tips on such essay writing check out an article at Pro-Papers about the William Shakespeare paper writing.
The demographic characteristics of respondents in regards to gender, age group, education level, position in their respective work placements and experience was the first item investigated in this study. The findings regarding these are presented in Table 1.1.
|Less than 20||47||15.7|
|2 years Diploma||34||11.3|
|Less than 6 months||5||1.7|
|10 and above||16||5.3|
Table 1:1: Kuwait State Audit Bureau demographic characteristics of respondents
Gender of respondents in Table 4.1 indicates that the majority of the respondents sampled to participate in this study were males (73 percent) while the least participants were the females with 27 percent. Much as there was somewhat wider gender gap, information provided by the two genders was instrumental and complimentary.
Regarding the age group of the respondents, it can clearly be observed that those who are below the age of 20 were 16 percent; those from 20 to 29 formed 31 percent; then those in 30 to 39 were 32 percent; those in 40 to 49 formed 17 percent and 50 to 59 were only 4 percent. In general, the majority of the respondents were the youth, that is to say those below the age of 40. Different age group was also very instrumental in sense that respondents of different age groups could sometimes have different opinions hence helping in the analysis of this study.
Experience of the respondents in the company was also considered highly under the demographic characteristics of respondents. Findings in Table 4.1 indicated that 2 percent of the respondents had less than 6 months experience; 21 percent of the respondents had from 6 months to 1 year experience; 20 percent of the respondents had experience of 2 to3 years; 32 percent of them had experience of 4 to 6 years; 21 percent of them had experience of 7 to 9 years; and lastly 5 percent of the respondents had more than 10 years’ experience. Findings indicate that over 58 percent of the respondents had over four years of experience hence capable of delivering the most needed information for this study.
As far as the findings on the position of the respondents was concerned, it can be observed that the majority of the respondents were the engineers (37 percent); followed by those in office administration (21 percent); next were the planers (14 percent); followed by the specialists (10 percent); after that were the team leaders (10 percent); and lastly, those in the management position (8 percent). This means that the majority of the respondents were familiar with the research concepts or variables.
Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing systems performance descriptive statistics
The measure the aspect of performance of organizational auditing systems, mean ranges and standard deviations were also used. The researcher followed the outlined mean ranges and their interpretations. The mean ranges from 1.00 -1.79 indicated that respondents strongly disagreed with the statement hence the situation of auditing system performance was very low; mean ranges from 1.80-2.59 indicated that most of the respondents disagreed with the statement hence the situation of auditing system performance was low; mean ranges from 2.60-3.39 indicated that most of the respondents neither disagreed nor agreed with the statement hence the situation of auditing system performance was moderate; the mean ranges 3.40-4.19 indicated that the majority of the respondents agreed with the statement hence the situation of auditing system performance was general high; and lastly, the mean ranges from 4.20-5.00 indicated that the majority of the respondents strongly agreed with the statement hence the situation of auditing system performance was generally very high. The findings on the situation of auditing system performance are summarized in Table 1.2.
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has increased the involvement in Kuwait State Audit Bureau on a department level and by a majority of workers, including myself||300||1||5||4.27||.803||Very High|
|The skills/knowledge I acquired at the Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices /Awareness will improve my job performance||300||1||5||4.11||.874||High|
|The skills/knowledge I acquired at the Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices /Awareness practices are useful to me in my current role||300||1||5||4.04||.845||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has provided me the knowledge of auditing system performance and has enhanced my competency||300||1||5||4.04||.718||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has improved my understanding of safety and accident prevention, and increased my confidence level responding in untoward Incidents||300||1||5||4.04||.835||High|
|The company completes the annual auditing system performance report||300||1||5||4.00||.836||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices promotes employee health and well being||300||1||5||3.99||.778||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices is aligned with new policies and legislations||300||1||5||3.96||.740||High|
|Effective auditing system performance offers a positive impact on health and enhances productivity||300||1||5||3.93||.835||High|
|I plan to use the skills/knowledge I acquired at the Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices /awareness back on the job||300||1||5||3.93||1.083||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has changed the mindset and work attitude of a majority of workers including myself, in regards auditing system performance concerns||300||1||5||3.90||.750||High|
|Workers are encouraged to be sustainable at work||300||1||5||3.86||.894||High|
|I think my company is very sustainable||300||1||5||3.85||.952||High|
|Auditing system performance practices are influenced by motivations in the workplace||300||1||5||3.81||.838||High|
|The company offers the necessary program to improve waste management||300||1||5||3.76||.913||High|
|The nature of product recycling is optimum hence enhancing auditing system performance||300||1||5||3.73||.913||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has resulted in my reduced materials usage, like paper for printing etc||300||1||5||3.66||.931||High|
|The Kuwait State Audit Bureau auditing practices has encouraged me in energy and water conservation while performing duties and responsibilities||300||1||5||3.65||.993||High|
|There is a balance of convenience in working with auditing system performance||300||1||5||3.64||.890||High|
|Overall Mean Average||3.90||High|
Table 1.2: Descriptive Statistics on the Kuwait State Audit Bureau Auditing system performance
Inferential data analysis
The relationship between the extent of Auditing Practices and level of auditing system performance was conducted using Pearson’s Linear Correlation coefficient (PLCC). This was done to find out whether the two study variables were positively related or not. Correlation of the two study variables was so important in this study since it helped in testifying whether the research hypotheses stated were right or not. The findings regarding these are presented in Table 1.3.
|Kuwait State Audit Bureau’s auditing system performance||Interpretation||Decision on Hypotheses|
|Auditing Practices||Pearson Correlation||0.973||Positive Significant relationship||Accepted
|Kuwait State Audit Bureau’s Auditing system performance||Pearson Correlation||0.973||Positive Significant relationship|
Table 1.3: Pearson’s Correlations matrix of Extent of Industrial Practices and auditing system performance
Considering the results from the correlation matrix in Table 1.3, it can be noted that there is a significant relationship between extent of Auditing Practices and the level of organizational auditing system performance. This was verified by a very high r-value of level of 0.973 and a very small significant value 0.00 at .05 level of significance. Therefore, the extent of auditing practices is positively significantly related to the level of organizational auditing system performance.
Considering the finding to either confirm or deny the research hypothesis on the amount of auditing practices conducted positively influencing the organizational auditing system performance, it can be noted that this research hypothesis is accepted. In this regard it can be stated that the level of auditing practices conducted in the organization is positively influences the level of auditing system performance.
Have you your homework assignments just appeared out of nowhere when you are already too busy to complete them? If such sudden task is a gender studies essay, for example, you can always order such writing at Pro-Papers.
Regression analysis on the relationship between auditing practices and auditing system performance
Regression analysis on the relationship between efficient auditing practices and auditing system performance was also done basically to test or determine the strength of relationship between auditing practices and level of auditing system performance. Regression analysis also helped in either affirming or negating the research hypothesis. Table 1.4 illustrates the findings on the strength of relationship between the two research variables.
|Model||R||R Square||Adjusted R Square||Std. Error of the Estimate|
|Model||Sum of Squares||df||Mean Square||F||Sig.|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Industrial Practices
b. Dependent Variable: Auditing system performance
Table 1.4: Regression Analysis on the Relationship between auditing practices and auditing system performance
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published / Required fields are marked *